Rating - 0/5
Synopsis:
Vijay, portrayed by Ranbir Kapoor, navigates a life yearning for the affection of his affluent father, played by Anil Kapoor. However, when the patriarch faces an attack, Vijay's response propels him from unstable to utterly unhinged! Brace yourself for a tumultuous journey as Vijay embarks on a revenge quest, leaving behind a trail of sheer absurdity in his pursuit of conspirators. "Animal" unfolds as a cinematic escapade, substituting psychological tension for a flurry of nonsensical chaos. Regrettably, the film is marred by a narrative replete with misogyny and gratuitous plot twists, rendering it a lamentable concoction of senseless storytelling.
Review:
Yuck, That's my first word which comes to my mind after watching this disastrous movie. Throughout the viewing experience, a prevailing sense of disgust overshadowed any potential engagement with the storyline. The narrative seemed to hinge upon a disturbing celebration of misogyny, serving as a platform for the director's personal fantasies rather than a cohesive exploration of character dynamics.
The portrayal of privilege, exemplified by the protagonist's familial connections, painted a bleak picture of a society where rules and regulations are perceived as mere inconveniences to the elite. This narrative choice, coupled with gratuitous violence and a lack of accountability, left a lingering sense of unease and frustration.
Vanga's direction seemed to revel in tired clichés, from the stereotypical "alpha" persona to the depiction of familial dynamics marred by favoritism and subjugation. The excessive use of violence, purportedly to compensate for narrative shortcomings, only served to further alienate viewers seeking substance over spectacle.
Of particular concern was the normalization of toxic behavior within relationships, with the film presenting disturbing scenarios that glorified manipulation and coercion under the guise of romanticism. Such themes, especially given the prevalence of similar issues in contemporary society, raise serious ethical questions about the film's messaging and impact on impressionable audiences.
Furthermore, the film's disjointed narrative and gratuitous scenes detracted from any semblance of coherence or depth. Subplots remained unresolved, leaving viewers with a sense of dissatisfaction and disconnection from the characters' journeys.
In light of these observations, it is difficult to endorse or recommend the film to discerning audiences. The portrayal of sensitive issues in a manner that sensationalizes and trivializes their gravity is deeply concerning, particularly in a cultural context where cinema holds significant influence.
The essence of this film could have been distilled into a simple conversation between the father and his son.
Comments